Aśvaghoṣa
Introduction
Aśvaghoṣa (馬鳴), the twelfth Indian patriarch, is a literary giant of Indian Buddhism. Author of the Buddhacarita (a verse biography of the Buddha), the Saundarananda, and the treatise Mahāyāna-śraddhotpāda, he wielded poetry with a power that even the most austere philosophers admired.
His name is said to come from the fact that when he spoke, even horses would whinny with emotion. A former Brahmin and formidable debater, he was converted by Puṇyayaśas not through logic but by the beauty of a verse about impermanence.
Keizan sees in him the model of transmission through art: when the heart is touched by beauty, the Dharma penetrates it without resistance.
The Twelfth Ancestor, the Venerable Ashvaghosha, asked the Venerable Bashyashas, 'I wish to know the Buddha. What thing is it?'The Venerable said, 'You wish to know the Buddha. That which is not known is it.'The Master said, 'If one does not know the Buddha, how can one know it is so?'The Venerable said,
'If one does not know the Buddha, how can one know it is not?'The Master said, 'This is the meaning of the saw.'The Venerable said, 'That is the meaning of the wood.'He asked further,
'What is the meaning of the saw?'The Master said, 'It emerges level with the master.'He asked again, 'What is the meaning of the wood?'The Venerable said, 'You are severed by me.'
The Master was suddenly awakened.
He was a man of Varanasi. He was also named Gunashri. He was so named because, among all merits, whether conditioned or unconditioned, his were the most excellent.
He went to the place of the Venerable Bashyashas and first asked, saying, 'I wish to know the Buddha. What is it?'The Venerable said,
If you wish to know the Buddha, it is precisely that which does not know.
Indeed, the very first thing one must inquire into when beginning the study of the dharma is this Buddha. All buddhas of the three times and all ancestral teachers through the generations are said to be those who study the Buddha. If one does not study the Buddha, all are named outsiders. Therefore, one should not seek through sound, nor should one seek to know through form and appearance. Thus, the thirty-two marks and eighty excellent characteristics are not sufficient to be called Buddha. Hence, I wish to know the Buddha. 'What is it that is precisely this?'one comes and asks. Then it is shown, saying: 'If you wish to know the Buddha, it is precisely that which does not know.'What is called 'that which does not know'is precisely the Venerable Ashvaghosha. How could it be another? From times before knowing to times of knowing, there is no separate upholding, no other appearance. Therefore, from past to present, it is just like this. Sometimes it bears the thirty-two marks and eighty excellent characteristics, sometimes it bears three heads and eight arms. Sometimes it sinks into the five decays and eight sufferings, sometimes it is covered with hair and wears horns, sometimes it carries iron yokes and chains. Always dwelling within the three realms, it upholds its own practice, emerging and submerging within one's own mind, bringing forth different faces. Therefore, even when coming into birth, one does not know what this is. Even when passing into death, one does not know what this is. Though one may try to attach a form, this is not a dharma that can be fabricated. Though one may try to assign a name, this too is not something that can be established. Therefore, from kalpa to kalpa, it has never been known; even though it follows me and accompanies me, it is entirely beyond discrimination.
Having heard the foregoing circumstances, many understand and say: 'If there is any knowing whatsoever, that would be contrary to Buddha. Not knowing and not making distinctions—that must be precisely Buddha.'
If one understands the present 'not knowing'in this way, why would the Venerable Bashyashita have troubled to show it thus? Entering darkness from darkness, it is just so, yet because it is not entirely 'thus,'he directly showed it, saying: 'That which does not know is Ashvaghosha.'Still not clear, one merely takes 'never having known'from the past to understand the present point of showing. Therefore, it is said: 'If one does not know the Buddha, how can one know that this is it?'The Venerable again showed: 'Since one does not know the Buddha, how can one know that this is not Buddha?'It is not to be sought elsewhere; that which does not know is precisely Buddha. How could one say it is not so?
The Master said: 'This is the meaning of the saw.'The Venerable said: 'That is the meaning of the wood.'Bashyashita again asked: 'What is the meaning of the saw?'The Master said: 'Equal emergence with the teacher.'Ashvaghosha also asked: 'What is the meaning of the wood?'The Venerable said: 'You are understood by me.'The Master suddenly awakened with great clarity.
Truly, you are thus, and I am thus. Opening wide in eight characters, entrusting with both hands. You receive not a single dot; I borrow not a small portion. Accordingly, equal emergence is exactly like a saw.
Therefore, it is said: the meaning of the saw. The master explained and said: I am the meaning of wood. The Venerable said: He is the meaning of wood. Why? Because it is pitch black, completely unknowable. Not attaching to a single point. Not borrowing a single knowing. Just like a block of wood, also like a pillar. Without mind, it is thus. Ultimately, there is no place for discrimination. Since one understands thus, it is said: He is the meaning of wood.
From the Extensive Record of Chan Master Hongzhi: 'Not receiving a single speck of dust, suddenly meeting on the road.'However, such understanding still retains residual habits and does not know the master's meaning. Here, the Venerable, out of compassionate descent, again asks: What is the meaning of the saw? The master said: Equal emergence with the master. Reaching this point, he again speaks for himself, and further asks: What is the meaning of wood? Yasas again extends his hand, entrusts him, and says: You are understood by me. Here, the way of master and disciple connects, ancient and present feelings are broken, making a path in a dream, walking through emptiness. Therefore, it is said: You are understood by me. Reaching this, mindless coagulation quickly dissolves, emerging from the cave of clarity, suddenly opening to enlightenment, and he is finally ranked as the Twelfth Patriarch.
The Venerable addressed the assembly saying: This great being was formerly a king in the country of Vaisali. In that country, there was a type of people who were naked like horses. The king, employing divine power, divided his body and became a silkworm. They then obtained clothing. That king was later born in Central India. The horse-people, feeling longing, cried out mournfully. Therefore, he was named Horse-Neigh. The Tathagata prophesied saying: After my nirvana, in six hundred years, there will be a wise one named Horse-Neigh. In Varanasi, he will crush heretical paths and widely liberate humans and devas, liberating countless people, and will transmit the teaching after me.
Now, precisely this is the time, it is said. Yasas then entrusted him with the Tathagata's True Dharma Eye Treasury.
Regarding this entire passage from beginning to end, do not mistakenly take the point of not knowing and not receiving as a place of everywhere not knowing. Even if it is not knowing, it is at the place before conception; carefully observing, carefully pondering, one seeks the face of Buddha, the face of ancestors, but does not attain it. One seeks the faces of humans, ghosts, animals, but does not attain them. This is not non-changing. This is not moving. It has never been empty. There is no discourse of inner and outer, no separation of right and partial.
Awakening to know that this is precisely one's own original face, even if it manifests as ordinary beings, sages, and sentient beings, even if it divides into the two realms of environment and beings, it entirely comes and goes within this, arises and ceases within this. Just as ocean water gives rise to waves, though they arise and arise, not a single drop of water increases. Also like waves ceasing; though they cease and cease, not a single drop is lost. Within the realms of humans and devas, it is temporarily called various Buddhas, called ghosts and animals. Just as on a single face, various faces are provisionally manifested. To call this the Buddha-face is not it; to call it the ghost-face is not it.
Yet the matter at the gate of establishing transformation, having come forth through knocking and singing, truly involves cultivating the samadhi of illusion, performing buddha-work within a dream. Through this, the transformative guidance of the Western Heaven as illusion-art continues unbroken to this day, circulating through the three countries, turning from the ordinary to enter the sacred. If one can thus transform and cultivate, then one's own faults become distant, and one's own birth-and-death no longer causes confusion. This indeed is the true original-faced monk.
Today, in raising up the causal conditions that have just come, there is, as usual, humble speech. Do you wish to hear it?
In the wild village, red peach blossoms know. Further instructing Lingyun to reach no doubt.
Texte source (伝光録 / Denkōroku)
第十二祖、馬鳴尊者、問夜奢尊者曰、我欲識佛、何物卽是。尊者曰、汝欲識佛、不識者是。師曰、佛既不識、焉知是乎。尊者曰、
既不識佛、焉知不是。師曰、此是鋸義。尊者曰、彼是木義。復問、
鋸義者何。師曰、與師平出。又問、木義者何。尊者曰、汝被我解。
師豁然省悟。
波羅奈國の人なり。亦た功勝と名く。有作無作、諸の功德を以て最も殊勝と爲すが故に名く。
卽ち夜奢尊者の處に參じて、最初に問て曰く、我れ佛を識らんと欲す。何者か卽ち是なる。尊者曰く、
汝ぢ佛を識らんと欲す、識らざる者是なりと。
實に參學の最初、必ず尋ぬべきは是佛なり。三世の諸佛、數代の祖師、盡く是れ學佛の漢といふ。若し佛を學せざれば、悉く是れ外道と名く。故に音聲を以て求むべきに非ず、色相を以て求め識るべきに非ず。故に三十二相八十種好を以て佛とするに足らず。因て我れ佛を識らんと欲す。何者か卽ち是なると問ひ來る。卽ち示して曰く、汝ぢ佛を識らんと欲す、識らざる者是なりと。謂ゆる識らざる者といふは正に是れ馬鳴尊者なり、豈他なら《景德傳燈錄》波羅柰國人也。亦名功勝。以有作無作諸功德最爲殊勝故名未だ識らざる時も識れる時も、別の保任なし、他の樣子なし。故に昔より今に及で只是の如し。有時は三十二相を帶し、八十種好を具し、三頭八臂を帶し。五衰八苦に沈み、有時は被毛戴角し、有時は鐵擔枷鎖す。常に三界中に居して、自己の行履を保任し、自心の中に頭出頭沒して、異面を帶し來る。故に生じ來るも是れ何者なりと知らず。死し去るも是れ何者なりと知らず。形を着けんとすれども、是れ造作すべき法に非ず。名を安ぜんとすれども、亦是れ建立すべきことに非ず。故に劫より劫に至るまで、曾て知る所なく、我に從ひ、我に伴ふとも、都て辨ずることなし。
適來の因縁を聽て、多く解して曰く、如何にも知ることあるは、卽ち是れ佛に違はん。知ることなく分つことなからん。正に是れ佛なるべしと云ふ。
今の不識、恁麼に會せば、何ぞ煩はしく夜奢尊者恁麼に示さん。冥より冥に入るに、只是の如く都て恁麼ならざる故に、直に示して曰く、不識者是馬鳴尚ほ明らめず、只是れ從來の識らずといふを以て、今の示す處を解す。故に曰く、佛既に識らずんば、焉ぞ是なることを知らんや。尊者重て示して曰く、既に佛を識らず、焉ぞ是佛ならさることを知らんと。其外に求むべきに非ず、不識者卽ち是れ佛なり。豈に不是と云べけんや。
師曰く、此は是れ鋸の義なり。尊者曰く、彼は是れ木の義なり。夜奢復問ふ、鋸の義とは何ぞや。師曰く、師と平出す。馬鳴又問ふ、木の義とは何ぞや。尊者曰く、汝、我に解せらる。師、豁然として省悟す。
實に汝も是の如く、我も是の如し。八字に打開し、兩手に分付す。汝も我も一點を受ず。吾も汝も少分を假らず。之に依て平出せること恰も鋸の如し。
故に謂ふ、鋸の義と。師解して曰く、吾は是れ木の義と。尊者曰く、彼は是れ木の義と。所以者何となれば黒漫漫として總て知る處なし。更に一點をも着ず。一知をも假らず。恰も木頭の如く、又露柱の如し。無心にして恁麼なり。終に辨別する處なし。恁麼に會する故に道ふ、彼は是れ木の義と。
《宏智禪師廣錄》不受一點塵埃驀路相逢。(T 2001.48.44a17-18).然れ共、恁麼の所解、餘習尚ほ殘て師の義を知らず。此に尊者、慈悲落草の故に復た問ふ、鋸の義とは何ぞや。師曰く、師と平出すと。此に至りて重て自ら道取して、又問ふ、木の義とは何ぞや。夜奢復た手を授て分付して曰く、汝、我に解せらると。爰に師資の道通じ、古今情破れて、夢中に路をなし來り、空裏を運歩しもてゆく。故に曰く、汝、我に解せらると。此に到て無心凝結速かに解け、明白の窠窟脱け來て、豁然として開悟し、遂に第十二祖に列す。
尊者、衆に謂て曰く、此大士は、昔し毘舎離國王たり。其國に一類の人あり。馬の如く裸露なり。王、神力を運び、身を分て蠶と爲る。彼れ乃ち衣を得たり。彼王、後に中印度に生る。馬人感戀して悲鳴す。因て馬鳴と號す 如來記して云く、吾滅度の後六百年、當に賢者馬鳴と云ふ者あり。波羅奈國に於て異道を摧伏して廣く人天を度し、度人無量、吾に繼で化を傳へんと。
今正くに是れ時なりと云て、夜奢卽ち如來の正法眼藏を付囑す。
此一段始終の處、猥りに不識不受の處として、處處不識なる所とすること勿れ。卽ち不識なりとも、未胞胎の處にして、子細に見得し子細に思量して、佛面祖面を模索すれども得ず。人面鬼畜を求覓すれども得ず。是れ不變なるにも非ず。是れ動著するにも非ず。曾て空なるにも非ず。内外の論なく、正偏の隔てなし。
正に是れ自己本來の面目なることを覺知して、設ひ凡聖含靈と顯はれ來り、依正二報と分れ來れども、全く此中に去來し、此中に起滅す。恰かも海水の波を起すが如く、起り起れども、曾て一水も増さず。又波の滅するが如し。滅し滅すれども、一滴も失はず。曾て人間天上の中に、暫らく諸佛と呼ばれ來り、鬼畜と呼れ來る。恰も一面上に假りに衆面を現ずるが如し。是れ佛面とせんも不是、鬼面とせんも不是。
然も建化門頭の事、敲唱し來り、正に如幻三昧を修習し、夢中の佛事を作し來る。之れに依りて西天の化導幻術、今に不斷、三國流轉して轉凡入聖し來るなり。能く恁麼に轉變修習して、方に自己の罪過をも疎くせず、自己の生死にも惑はされず。是れ眞箇本色の衲僧なるべし。
今日、適來の因縁を擧揚するに、例に依て卑語あり。聞かんと要すや。
野村紅不桃華識。更教靈雲到不疑。
Translated from kanbun based on the text provided by CBETA (Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Association (CBETA)), T2585. Composed in 1309.
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — Unless otherwise noted, all content on this site is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.