Saṅghānandin
Introduction
Saṅghānandin (僧伽難提), the seventeenth Indian patriarch, was a contemplative monk who preferred the solitude of the forests and caves to the bustle of the great monasteries. His name means "the joy of the community" — an apparent paradox for a hermit.
Rāhulata discovered him in a cave in the Himalayan mountains, sitting motionless, eyes closed, after years of uninterrupted meditation. The transmission took place in this wild setting, far from institutions.
Keizan teaches that the true Saṅgha is not an organized human group — it is the presence of all the awakened, past, present and future, throughout the universe.
The Seventeenth Ancestor, Venerable Sanghanandi, upon hearing Rāhulata's verse, was shown: 'Since I have no self, you must see my self. Since you have taken me as your teacher, know that I am not my self.'Hearing this, the master's mind opened wide. He then sought liberation.
The master was the son of King Ratnavyūha in the city of Śrāvastī. From birth, he was able to speak.
He constantly praised the Buddha's work. At the age of seven, he already grew weary of worldly pleasures. Using a verse, he informed his parents:
I bow to the great compassionate father, I pay homage to the mother of flesh and blood. I now wish to leave home, I beseech you to take pity on me.
His parents firmly tried to stop him. He then fasted for an entire day. They finally permitted him to leave home while remaining at the palace. He was named Sanghanandi. They also appointed the monk Chandrika as his teacher. For nineteen years, he never slackened or grew weary. The master often reflected to himself:
My body resides in the royal palace, how can I truly leave home? One evening, a heavenly light descended. By chance, he saw a level path and unconsciously walked slowly along it. After about ten li, he arrived before a great cliff.
There was a stone cave, wherein he dwelt in serene solitude. The king, having lost his son, banished Chanliduo from the kingdom to search for his child, yet he knew not his whereabouts. Ten years passed, and thus he left home. One evening, a heavenly light descended. Seeing a road level and smooth, he unconsciously walked slowly. After about ten li, he arrived before a great cliff. There was a stone cave. He dwelt in serene solitude within. The father, having lost his son, immediately banished Chanliduo from the kingdom to search for his child, not knowing his whereabouts. Ten years passed. (The Venerable Rahulata, traveling to teach, arrived at the city of Shravasti. There was a river named Goldwater, its taste exceptionally sweet. In midstream appeared the shadows of five buddhas. The Venerable addressed the assembly: 'The source of this river, some five hundred li distant, is where the sage Sanghanandi dwells. The Buddha prophesied that after a thousand years, he would inherit the sage's seat.'Having spoken, he led the assembly of disciples upstream. Arriving there, they saw Sanghanandi serenely seated in samadhi. The Venerable and the assembly waited for him. After twenty-one days, he finally arose from samadhi. The Venerable asked: 'Is it your body that is in samadhi, or your mind?'The master said: 'Both body and mind are in samadhi.'The Venerable said: 'If both body and mind are in samadhi, how can there be entering and exiting?')
Truly, if one speaks of body and mind being in samadhi, how can there be entering and exiting? If one cultivates samadhi directed toward body and mind, this is still not true samadhi. If it is not true samadhi, then there is entering and exiting. If there is entering and exiting, it should be said that this is not samadhi. Do not seek body and mind in the place of samadhi.
Zazen is fundamentally the dropping away of body and mind. What can be called body? What can be called mind?
The master said:
Although there is entering and exiting, the characteristic of samadhi is not lost. It is like gold in a well; the substance of gold is constantly serene. The Venerable said:
Although there is entering and exiting, the characteristic of samadhi is not lost. It is like gold in a well; the substance of gold is constantly serene. If gold is in the well, if gold leaves the well, yet the gold has no movement or stillness, what thing could enter or exit?
If gold has movement and stillness, has a place of emergence and a place of entry, then it is not true gold. Yet, you still do not penetrate this principle. The master said:
Gold moves and is still; what thing speaks of entering and exiting? It speaks of gold's entering and exiting. Gold is not movement and stillness; gold has no movement and stillness. If one says there is entering and exiting, there is still a dualistic view. Therefore, the Venerable One said:
If gold is in the well, then what emerges is not gold. If gold emerges from the well,
then what remains is what thing?
Outside, ultimately not letting in; inside, also not letting out. When emerging, it emerges completely; when entering, it enters completely. Why be in the well, and also emerge from the well? Therefore, what emerges is not gold. What remains is what thing? One does not reach this principle. The master said:
If gold emerges from the well, what remains is not gold. If gold is in the well, what emerges is not a thing.
This statement truly does not know the nature of gold. Therefore, the Venerable said,
This meaning is not so.
Although it truly seems to penetrate the principle while abiding in concentration, the master still has views of self and other. Therefore, it is said: 'If gold emerges from the well, it is not gold. If gold is in the well and emerges, it is not a thing.'This meaning is not so. That principle is not attachment. That meaning is not attachment.
However, this meaning lacks truth, like a light feather following the wind. Because it is not true, the Venerable said this meaning should fall away.
Based on the master's words, it is said. The master said:
That meaning does not stand.
The Venerable One, relying on the profound depth of great compassion and great kindness, spoke again:
If that principle is not established, then my principle is established.
However, because one mistakenly understands non-self. The master said:
This principle should fall. That principle is not established. That principle is not established, my principle is established. Even though my principle is established, the dharma is not mine.
The Venerable One said:
My principle is already established, because I am without self.
Although one knows that indeed all dharmas are without self, one still does not know the true reality. The Master said:
Since I am without self, what meaning could possibly be accomplished?
Wishing to let him know intimately, the Venerable One said:
Since I am without self, I accomplish your meaning.
Indeed, the four great elements are all not the self. The five aggregates are originally not existent. Because one discriminates and makes distinctions, thinking there is a self in such a selfless place, the Master asked:
Noble one, under which sage as teacher did you attain this selflessness?
To demonstrate that the way of teacher and disciple is not to be taken lightly, the Venerable said:
I take the great being Kanadeva as my teacher, and through him I have realized this selflessness.
The teacher said:
I bow to you, teacher Deva. You emerged from the benevolent one. Since the benevolent one is selfless, I wish to take you as my teacher.
The Venerable replied, saying:
Benevolent one, from which sage did you learn this selflessness? My teacher Kanadeva realized this selflessness. Since I am already selfless, you must see my self. If you take me as your teacher, know that my self is not my self.
Indeed, one who truly sees the real self no longer retains even the self; how could any dharma obstruct the eye? Seeing, hearing, sensing, and knowing are ultimately undivided; not a single thing, not a single dharma can be separated. Therefore, sage and ordinary are not apart; the way of master and disciple merges. When one sees this principle, one meets the buddhas and ancestors. Thus, one takes oneself as the master, and the master as oneself. Even with axe and blade, it cannot be opened.
Such principle is suddenly realized. Therefore, one immediately seeks liberation. The Venerable said: 'Your mind is free; it is not bound by me.'Having spoken, the Venerable then raised a golden bowl with his right hand, lifting it to the Brahma palace. He took that fragrant food to offer a meal to the assembly. But the assembly suddenly produced a mind of aversion. The Venerable said: 'It is not my fault; it is your own karma.'He then instructed Sanghanandi to share his seat and eat together. The assembly was astonished. The Venerable said: 'That you cannot eat is all because of this. You should know that the one who shares my seat is the past Śāla Tree King Tathāgata. Out of compassion for beings, he descended. You all, though having reached the third fruit in the Kalpa of Adornment, have not yet realized the non-outflow.'The assembly said: 'Our master's spiritual power we can believe. But calling him a past buddha—we secretly doubt.'Knowing the assembly's arrogance, he then said: 'When the World-Honored One was in the world, the world was level and even, without hills or valleys. Rivers and streams, all waters were sweet and fine. Plants flourished, the land was abundant and full, without the eight sufferings, practicing the ten virtues. Since his nirvana under the twin trees over eight hundred years ago, the world has become hilly and barren, trees withered and dry. People lack deep faith, right mindfulness is slight. They do not believe in true suchness, only love spiritual power.'Having spoken, with his right hand gradually extending into the ground, reaching the diamond wheel realm, he took nectar water, and holding it in a lapis lazuli vessel, brought it to the assembly place. The assembly,
all seeing it, all submitted and repented.
It is pitiable: since the Tathāgata's time in the world eight hundred years, it is still like this. How much more now, a hundred years later, even if one barely hears the name of the Buddha-dharma, one cannot discern what the principle might be. Because there is no thorough body-mind, there is no one to ask what should be done. Even if one somewhat attains this principle, there is no one to protect and uphold it. Even if there are teachers, relying on the great compassionate precepts, and one has some awareness and understanding, yet perhaps invaded by laziness, there is no true faith and understanding. Therefore, without true practitioners, there are none who truly arouse the mind. Truly, due to the degenerate age and clumsy past karma, one encounters such a time. Shameful and regrettable, it is excessive.
Yet, all you virtuous ones, born in the period of True Dharma and Semblance Dharma. Whether as master or disciple, though pitiable, consider: the Buddha-dharma gradually moved eastward, reaching the Final Dharma age; in our land hearing the Tathāgata's True Dharma is barely fifty or sixty years. It should be said this matter is just beginning. Wherever the Buddha-dharma reaches, it does not fail to flourish.
You all, with vigorous exertion, arouse the aspiration, do not take self as self, directly realize no-self, quickly attain no-mind, not constrained by bodily and mental actions, not confined by feelings of delusion and enlightenment, not lingering in the cave of birth and death, not entangled in the net of beings and buddhas, you should know: from immeasurable kalpas past, throughout the endless future, there is an I that has never changed.
The mind's mechanism turns and is called the mind's appearance. How many aspects of my own face come forth?
Translated from kanbun based on the text provided by CBETA (Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Association (CBETA)), T2585. Composed in 1309.
Texte source (伝光録 / Denkōroku)
第十七祖、僧伽難提尊者、因羅睺羅多、以偈示曰、我已無我故、汝須見我我。汝既師我故、知我非我我。師聞心意豁然。既求度脱。
師は室羅筏城、寶莊嚴王の子なり。生れながらにして能く言ふ。
常に佛事を讚す。七歳にして卽ち世樂を厭ひ、偈を以て其父母に《景德傳燈錄》第十七祖僧伽難提者。室羅閥城寶莊嚴王之子也。生而能言。
常讚佛事。七歳即厭世樂。以偈告其父母曰。稽首大慈父、和南骨血母、我今欲出家、幸願哀愍故、父母固止之。遂終日不食。乃許其在家。出家號僧伽難提。復命沙門禪利多爲之師。積十九載未曾退倦。尊者每自念言。身居王宮告て曰く、「稽首大慈父。和南骨血母。我今欲出家。幸願哀愍故。
」父母固く之を止む。遂に終日食せず。乃ち其家に在て出家するを許す。僧伽難提と號す。復た沙門禪利多に命じて之が師たらしむ。積で十九載、未だ嘗て退倦せず。師、毎に自ら念言すらく、
身王宮に居す、胡ぞ出家とせんと。一夕、天光下る。偶一路の坦平なるを見て覺へず徐ろに行く。約十里許にして、大巖前に至る。
石窟あり、乃ち中に燕寂す。父王、既に子を失て卽ち禪利多を擯し、國を出て其子を訪尋せしむれども、所在を知らず。十年を經胡爲出家。一夕天光下屬。見一路坦平不覺徐行。約十里許至大巖前。有石窟焉。乃燕寂于中。父既失子。即擯禪利多出國。訪尋其子不知所在。經十年。(T《景德傳燈錄》行化至室羅筏城。有河名曰金水。其味殊美。中流復現五佛影。尊者告眾曰。此河之源凡五百里。有聖者僧伽難提居於彼處。佛誌一千年後當紹聖位。語已領諸學眾泝流而上。至彼見僧伽難提安坐入定。尊者與眾伺之。經三七日方從定起。尊者問曰。汝身定耶。心定耶。曰身心俱定。尊者曰。身心俱定何有出入。(T 2076.51.211c12-19).羅睺羅多尊者、行化して室羅筏城に到る。河あり、名を金水と曰ふ。其味、殊に美なり。中流に復た五佛の影を現ず。尊者、衆に告て曰く、此河の源、凡五百里、聖者僧伽難提と云あり、彼處に居せり。佛記したまふ、一千年の後、當に聖位を紹ぐべしと。語り已て諸學衆を領し、流に沂て上る。彼こに至りて僧伽難提を見るに、安坐入定せり。尊者、衆と之を伺ふ。三七日を經て方に定より起つ。尊者問て曰く、汝、身の定か、心の定か。師曰く、身心倶に定なり。尊者曰く、身心倶に定ならば、何ぞ出入あらんと。
實に身心もし定なりと謂はば、何ぞ出入あらんや。若し身心に向て定を修せば、是れ尚ほ眞定に非ず。若し眞定に非ずんば、卽ち是れ出入あらん。若し出入あらば、是れ定に非ずと謂ふべし。定の處に向て身心を求ること勿れ。
參禪は本より身心脱落なり。何を呼でか身と爲し、何を呼でか心と爲ん。
師曰く、
出入ありと雖も、定相を失せず、金の井に在るが如く、金體常寂尊者曰く、
《景德傳燈錄》雖有出入不失定相。如金在井金體常寂。(T 2076.51.211c20).若し金、井に在り、若し金、井を出るに、金に動靜なくんば、何物か出入せんと。
其れ金に動靜あり、出處あり入處あらば、是れ眞金に非ず。然も猶ほ此道理に通ぜず。師曰く、
金動靜す、何物か出入と言ふ。金の出入を言ふ。金、動靜に非ず金に動靜なし、出入ありと謂はば、猶ほ是れ、兩箇の見あり。故に尊者曰く、
若し金、井に在ては出る者何ぞ金ならん。若し金、井を出ては、
在る者何物ぞ。
《景德傳燈錄》若金在井若金出井金無動靜何物出入。(T 2076.51.211c21-《景德傳燈錄》言金動靜何物出入。許金出入金非動靜。(T 2076.51.211c22-《景德傳燈錄》若金在井出者何金。若金出井在者何物。(T 2076.51.211c23-外 、終に放入せず、内、亦放出せず。出れば出で盡き、入れば入り盡く。何ぞ井に在り、又井を出ん。故に出る者は金に非ず。在る者は何物ぞと言ふなり。此理に達せず。師曰く、
金、若し井を出ては、在る者は金に非ず。金、若し井に在らば、出る者、物に非ず。
此言は實に金の性を知らず。故に尊者曰く、
此義然らず。
實に定に在て理を通ずるに似たりと雖も、師、猶ほ物我の見あり。故に曰《景德傳燈錄》金若出井在者非金。金若在井出者非物。(T 2076.51.211c24-《景德傳燈錄》此義不然。(T 2076.51.211c25).《景德傳燈錄》彼理非著 (T 2076.51.211c25).彼義著なるに非ず。
然も此義眞實なし、輕毛の風に隨ふが如し。眞實ならざる故に。尊者曰此義當に墮すべし。
師の言に依て謂ふ。師曰く、
彼義成ずるに非ずと。
尊者、大慈大悲の深きに依て重て曰く、
彼義成ぜずんば、我義成ぜり。
然れども妄りに無我を解する故に。師曰く、
《景德傳燈錄》此義當墮。(T 2076.51.211c26).《景德傳燈錄》彼義不成。(T 2076.51.211c26).《景德傳燈錄》彼義不成我義成矣。(T 2076.51.211c26-27).我義成ずと雖も、法は我に非ざるが故に。
尊者曰く、
我が義已に成ず、我れ我なきが故に。
實に法法皆無我なることを知ると雖も、尚ほ是れ眞實を知らず。師曰く、
我れ我なきが故に、復た何の義を成ぜん。
親く汝を知らしめんとして、尊者曰く、
我れ我なきが故に汝が義を成ずと。
《景德傳燈錄》我義雖成法非我故。(T 2076.51. 211c27).《景德傳燈錄》我義己成我無我故。(T 2076.51.211c28).《景德傳燈錄》我無我故復成何義。(T 2076.51.211c28-29).《景德傳燈錄》我無我故故成汝義。(T 2076.51.211c29).實に四大悉く我に非ず。五蘊本より有に非ず。是の如く無我なる所に我あることを、少しく思量分別し辨まへる故に、師問て曰く、
仁者何の聖をか師として、是無我を得たる。
師資の道の猥りならざることを知らしめん爲に、尊者曰く、
我れ伽那提婆大士を師として、是の無我を證す。
師曰く、
稽首提婆師。而出於仁者。仁者無我故。我欲師仁者。
尊者答て曰く、
《景德傳燈錄》仁者、師於何聖得是無我。(T 2076.51.211c29-212a1).《景德傳燈錄》我師迦那提婆證是無我。(T 2076.51.212a1-2).我已無我故。汝須見我我。汝若師我故。知我非我我。
實に夫れ眞實我を見得する人は、自己尚ほ存せず、豈萬法の眼に遮ぎることを得んや。見聞覺知終に分たず、一事一法、更に分つことなし。故に聖凡隔てなく、師資の道合す。此道理を見得する時、乃ち佛祖に相見すとす。 故に自己を以て師とし、師を以て自己とす。刀斧斫れども開けず。
恁麼の道理豁然として契ふ。故に卽ち度脱を求む。尊者曰く、汝が心自在なり。我が繫ぐ所に非ずと。語り已つて、尊者卽ち右手を以て金鉢を擎げて、擧て梵宮に至る。彼の香飯を取て將に大衆に齋せんとす。而して大衆忽ちに厭惡の心を生ず。尊者曰く、我が咎に非ず、汝等が自業なり。卽ち僧伽難提に命じて、座を分て同食す。衆、之を訝かる。尊者曰く、汝食を得ざることは、皆此に由るが故に。當に知るべし、吾と座を分つ者、卽ち過去の娑羅樹王如來なり。物を愍んで降迹す。汝輩、亦た莊嚴劫中に已に三果に至りしも、未だ無漏を證せざる者なり。衆曰く、我が師の神力は斯れ信ずべし。彼を過去佛と云ふ者、卽ち竊に疑ふ。師、衆の慢を生ずるを知て、乃ち曰く、世尊の在日は世界平正にして丘陵あることなし。江河溝洫、水悉く甘美なり。草木滋茂し、國土豊盈して八苦なく十善を行じき。雙樹に滅を示してより八百餘年、世界丘墟にして樹木枯悴し、人に至信なく、正念輕微なり。眞如を信ぜず、唯神力を愛すと。言ひ訖て、右手を以て漸く展て地に入て金剛輪際に至り、甘露水を取り、瑠璃器を以て持て會所に至る。大衆、
皆見て皆歸伏悔過す。
《景德傳燈錄》難提心意豁然。即求度脱。尊者曰。汝心自在非我所繫。語已即以右手擎金鉢舉至梵宮。取彼香飯將齋大衆。而大衆忽生厭惡之心。尊者曰。非我之咎汝等自業。即命僧伽難提分坐同食。衆復訝之。尊者曰汝不得食。皆由此故。當知與吾分坐者。即過去娑羅樹王如來也。愍物降迹。汝輩亦莊嚴劫中已至三果而未證無漏者也。衆曰我師神力斯可信矣。彼云過去佛者即竊疑焉。僧伽難提知衆生慢。乃曰。世尊在日世界平正。無有丘陵江河溝洫。水悉甘美草木滋茂。國土豐盈無八苦行十善。自雙樹示滅八百餘年。世界丘墟樹木枯悴。人無至信正念輕微。不信真如唯愛神力。言訖。以右手漸展入地。至金剛輪際取甘露水。以瑠璃器持至會所。大衆見之即時欽慕悔過作悲むべし、如來在世より八百年、尚ほ是の如し。何に況や後百歳の今、僅に佛法の名字を聞くとも、道理如何なるべしとも辨まへず。到れる身心なき故に、如何なるべきぞと尋ぬる人なし。聊か其道理を得ることあれども、護持し來ることなし。設ひ知識ありて、大慈大悲の教誡に依て、聊か覺知覺了ありと雖も、或は懈怠に侵されて眞實の信解なし。故に眞實の道人なければ、眞實發心する者なし。實に末世の澆運宿業の拙きに依て、是の如きの時分に遭へり。愧ても悔ても餘りあり。
然も諸仁者、正法像法に生ず。師としても資としても、悲むべしと雖も、思ふべし、佛法東漸して末法に至て我朝如來の正法を聞くこと、僅に五六十年なり。這事初めなりと謂つべし。佛法到る處に興らずといふことなし。
汝等が勇猛精進にして志を發し、吾我を吾我とせず、直に無我を證し、速に無心なることを得て、身心の作に拘ることなく、迷悟の情に封ぜらるることなく、生死窟に留ることなく、生佛の綱に結ぼふることなく、無量劫來、盡未來際、曾て變易せざる我あることを知るべし。
心機宛轉稱心相。我我幾分面目來。
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — Unless otherwise noted, all content on this site is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.